Memories Of Another Election Ten Years Ago
It was an April Fools Day that I will never forget.
Ten years ago, this past Monday, I was elected to my first term as Mayor of Decatur.
I suppose there are better days to win election to public office than April Fools Day, but, in
2003 that’s when the election was held.
It seems like only yesterday.
I've written a lot about next Tuesday’s election in recent months and there’s a lot of ‘“City
Hall Insider” in this week's print edition.
However, the past week, my mind has gone back to that April Fools Day in 2003, and I’ve
relived some of the memories of that day and night because it really was a special time for me
when the community I love elected me to be their mayor.
Probably, what stimulated my thoughts even more was an old Osborne for Mayor campaign
button that one of our readers found in an antique store recently and sent a copy of it to me.
It brought back memories of a year -long campaign, three opponents in the primary election
and family, friends and countless other supporters who spent a lot of time helping me win
the election.
One of the things I remember the most about the results of that night, is that I never really
had any time to celebrate -- because it was Tuesday night and I had to finish that week’s edition
of the Decatur Tribune by getting it ready to go to press, complete with the election results.
I cannot think of that night without feeling a little guilty that I wasn’t able to spend more
time with family, friends and others gathered at the victory celebration at Carolyn’s Cafe on
Main Street to enjoy the moment and thank them for all of their hard work.
It wasn’t long after doing some interviews with the media, getting some congratulatory pats
on the back and thanking everyone, that I had to walk back to the newspaper and wear my
editor’s hat and get the Trib ready.
The same routine had happened on the Tuesday night I won the primary election several
weeks earlier -- since the Trib had to be finished and go to press.
After a few interviews and thanking my supporters at the courthouse, I started walking
back to newspaper to finish that edition.
Phil Jacobs, a photographer for the Herald & Review, asked if he could go back to the
Tribune with me and shoot a photo of me typing the story about the election results.
So, there was Phil, from the daily newspaper shooting photos of me as I was typing the
story about the election results for the Decatur Tribune!
Also I've included the photo with this article that was shot during an interview with WSOY’s
Brian Byers at the Chamber’s Business Expo at the civic center the following morning.
I had worked all night to get the newspaper to press and had just enough time to get home,
shower, change clothes and give the “State of the City” speech at the Expo.
That kind of routine would happen a lot over the years that I served in both positions but
the newspaper never came out late and I managed to meet about all of my mayoral obligations.
When long, often hotly-contested city council meetings were over, I always had to head
back to the newspaper to work on that week’s edition.
It required seven days a week over the years that I served in both positions. There were
no vacations -- just some brief breaks for family activities and church.
I don’t want to add up all of the hours I worked at both positions, but I remember when
I returned to the private sector, spending 60 to 70 hours a week publishing this newspaper
seemed like a part-time job!
Looking back to that April 1st ten years ago and the subsequent years and re-election as
mayor, I still consider it a great honor (and a lot of work) to have been elected mayor that day
but, if I knew then what I know now ... well, I would have made the same commitment. I loved
serving as mayor and working hard to do good things for the community.
As far as the stress and crazy work schedule that about destroyed my health, I wasn’t
surprised.
After all, I was elected on April Fools Day!
* * *
Posted 4/4/13
Decatur's 'Other Lake' That Disappeared Forever
A couple of weeks ago, during a meeting on the proposed water enhancement plan in the conference room at the civic center, Mayor Mike McElroy asked me how close we had come to building a second lake several years ago when I was mayor.
He was my closest ally on the council during those years and knew that a lot of hard work had been put into building a second lake on the north side of Decatur.
“Very close,” I answered.
Land had been optioned where the lake could be built, major companies and private citizens with necessary expertise, had joined in to help guide the project towards reality.
All of the planets were, as they say, lined up to finally make the second lake a reality after decades of study and the conclusion that it was the best option to enhance the city’s water storage capacity.
In addition, it was also going to deal with Lake Decatur sediment disposal because maintaining the lake was also critical in the plan.
As a bonus, there would be residential and commercial development, plus green space around the lake -- all of which would generate revenue for the City of Decatur which is always good for the taxpayers.
The basic plan called for building the second lake and dredging Lake Decatur. The second lake was never meant to replace Lake Decatur, but supplement the water it contained.
What killed the project, more than anything, was not the proposed lake concept, but what would be developed around it and who would build it.
Some also worried about who was going to make money out of the project instead of whether it would be good for Decatur.
Others wanted to fight over what school districts would get a chunk of the revenue and the “want my piece of the pie” arguments went on and on.
Some turned thumbs down on the project because they didn’t like someone who was supporting it.
After many years of hard work, by so many, the second lake project was killed off by “community politics”.
I never worked harder on a project and it was my greatest disappointment as mayor because I knew how great it was going to be for our community.
I think what bothered me the most when the project was killed off, was I knew it was Decatur’s last chance to built it. It was an opportunity lost forever along with the economic ripple effect that could have benefitted everybody in our city and beyond.
The frustration I felt was in realizing there would be no more opportunities for a second lake and the “ripple” economic impact on our community.
We could fight battles on other projects, such as how to get more police space or downtown redevelopment and have setbacks, but there would always be another day to do battle on those projects -- and we’ve seen those battles won the past few years.
Not so with the lake. That was Decatur’s final shot at the best of all water options and, quite frankly, the long effort, and the reason it died, took a lot out of me.
Now, several years later, the city council is looking at a plan that contains several options, including dredging Lake Decatur.
As I mentioned in the “City Hall Insider” column last week, the proposed plan looks pretty solid, but it is now the best option only because the second lake project “dried up” due to extreme short-sightedness.
I applaud City Manager Ryan McCrady, the mayor and city council for moving ahead with a water plan after a near “act of God” (three droughts in six years) called for emergency action.
The city council is going to approve the proposal even though it is going to double the bills of water customers over the next three years.
They really have no choice.
It doesn't make me bitter to think back on those days when a golden opportunity slipped away, but it does make me sad to think about what could have happened to improve our quality of life -- didn’t happen, and why.
As we work to become a “world class community” we must make more “world class” decisions in the months and years ahead.
We must be pro-active, not reactive about our future.
Otherwise we will be paying more and more for less and less.
City Council Expected To Approve Water Plan,
Huge Rate Hike To Customers
Unless something changes things the city council is expected to approve a plan for massive water system improvements which will more than double the amount commercial and residential water customers will pay for water usage over the next three years.
That increase follows a 50% jump in water rates which the city council approved five years ago.
There is no doubt that three droughts in the past six years have ignited a fire under the council and city staff to make sure Decatur is prepared to adequately deal with any drought in the coming years.
Actually, there are two issues rolled into one when the city council votes on this proposal.
There is (1) the proposed plan to resolve the water storage and system maintenance problem and (2) raising the water customers’ rates to pay for it.
I really haven’t heard any criticism about enhancing the city’s water supply and system. The majority of people believe something needs to be done and those I have talked with who didn’t think too much about it a few years ago, seem more apt to understand the problem after two more droughts.
During the drought of 2007, many thought it would not happen again for many years -- and we survived that one.
I don’t think anyone expected there to be two more drought years within the five years following the first drought.
The case has been made to the city council and the public that something needs to be done -- and it needs to start immediately.
Spread The Rate Increase?
Any misgivings about the plan by the city council seem to be in the implementation of the size of the rate increase over the next three years and its impact on residents who are least able to pay.
A few council members have asked about spreading the rate increase over more than three years, but City Manager Ryan McCrady said that would delay some of the work that needs to be started immediately.
There is no question that, if we are going to retain the jobs of major industries, or attract any business that uses lots of water in the future, we must have a stable supply that can withstand droughts.
I was mayor, and co-chair of the Greater Decatur Water Commission, when the first drought hit in 2007.
We were taking steps to resolve the problem and came close to doing so back then (See my “Viewpoint” on page 3) but it didn’t happen.
The City of Decatur had received a warning from the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency that we faced a water capacity problem.
Back in 2005, the minutes of the city council meeting reflected that Springfield was going to construct a second lake “although that community does not have as great a need as Decatur because of our grain processing facilities.”
On Sept. 19, 2005, Jim Shafter, legal counsel with Archer Daniels Midland Company, stood before us (council) and stated that “water is a lifeline for ADM and there is an urgent need for water.”
All studies over the decades pointed to a second lake or reservoir as the solution -- along with continued dredging of Lake Decatur.
Council Members Heard The Details Earlier
Although the public first heard the details of the water system enhancement proposal during a study session at the last regular council meeting a few weeks ago, I can assure you it was not the first time the city council had heard the details.
Private meetings with one or two council members at a time is a fairly standard policy for most councils.
Those meetings are legal and do not violate the Open Meetings Act.
Not only does it give council members a big heads up and a chance to ask questions while an official meeting is not taking place, it also gives the city manager and staff the opportunity to gauge the support, or lack of support, for a major proposal.
I would speculate, based on my experiences in office, that if the city manager and mayor didn’t think the votes were there to pass this proposal, it would not be presented in an official public council meeting.
The city manager and mayor organize the agenda, and, back when I was one half of that two-some, I can assure you that any such major proposal would not make it to the agenda if I felt it would be defeated.
Usually, more work was done on it to make it more acceptable to the council in order to get it passed.
The difficult part came (and comes) when a mayor and city manager do not know for sure what the council will do. Also, some council members will change their minds within minutes of a vote.
The present city council seems to be easier to read than some of the past and if there was a real danger this proposal would be defeated, I can assure you some fine tuning would take place.
That’s why I believe the support is there to approve the proposal.
Financial Impact On Many Water Customers Is The Downside
You don’t have to be a water expert to know the aggressive hike in water rates to our customers is a real downer.
I was mayor when we implemented the last rate hike in 2008. The raise amounted to about 50% and it was like pulling teeth to get it passed -- especially when a group called ChangeDecatur was jumping all over the recommendation for the raise in rates proposed by City Manager Steve Garman because of the system running deficits.
What most people didn’t know at the time was the amount of the raise in rates wasn’t Garman’s idea, but City Councilman Pat Laegeler (who is still on the council) because he didn’t believe what Garman had proposed was enough.
There were all kinds of accusations about raising the rates, from landlords and many others who wrote letters to the editor (even to my own newspaper) protesting the move.
Finally, the city council, after a lot of discussion, approved a 15% raise each year for three years.
I asked present City Manager Ryan McGrady why, after raising the water rates 50% just five years ago, that it was necessary to double them over the next three years -- that amounts to three times what water customers were paying back in 2008.
He indicated the cost of operating the system has gone up substantially from five years ago because the price of about everything the city uses continues to go up.
I do know there’s been layoffs in the department due to the bad economy and also, when John Smith retired as head of that department, he was not replaced, due to the financial crunch.
The city manager and Keith Alexander (Director of Water Management) filled the important position left by Smith.
So, it’s not a question of the department spending money like -- well, water -- that resulted in the proposed increase.
The water department has been playing catch up for the last several years, plus added costs that will be incurred in the new proposed options can only be paid through increasing the rates.
There is no money to use from some other department and the water fund needs to support itself.
Will Water Fund Money Be Transferred To Another Account?
The revenues generated by the water department must stay in that department. They cannot be transferred into another department or another account to make up for a future shortfall.
The water funds have a certain “sanctity” to them.
You don’t mess around with the water funds.
However, it hasn’t been that long ago that the “Looking for Lincoln” fund that was built through a percentage of the hotel/motel tax, had accumulated a million dollars, although the balance dropped after money was spent on some Lincoln projects.
When the City really needed the money to cover another expense, the remainder of the “Looking for Lincoln” fund was drained and used for another purpose -- so a promise regarding those funds was not kept.
When I asked McCrady what was to prevent funds accumulated for water enhancement projects, ending up being withdrawn for some future financial need where the money is spent elsewhere.
McCrady told me that was very unlikely to happen. He said the “Looking For Lincoln” funds had not been designated to pay for a specific project and that was a difference between it and the water fund.
He said it would be very difficult for the city council to make that move.
Investors’ money would have to stay in the fund.
I think that is all the more reason to hold this council and future councils accountable that the increase in rates will only be used on the water system.
That will include a lot of individual council decisions in the future in the bidding process, etc.
Why Are We Going To Need An Additional 15 MGD Per Day By 2030?
The proposed water plan report to the city council indicates that an additional 8 million gallons of water per day are presently needed to survive a major drought lasting 10 months.
“By 2030 our community will need an additional 15 MGB per day,” the memorandum stated.
I asked McCrady about the substantial increase in water needs for 2030, when Decatur’s population has been shrinking and there’s presently no new industry making a move to come here.
McCrady told me the projection was not his, or city staff’s, but came from an agency whose purpose is to study the water needs of a community.
That projection in the report I found a little puzzling considering the aforementioned factors -- but I assume they know a lot more about projecting future water needs than I do.
No Grants, Government Help Available For The Project
McCrady told me that, at the present time, the City will move ahead without any meaningful financial assistance from the state or federal government. (Of course, the state and federal governments don’t have any money and seeking such help could delay moving ahead on the water project for years.)
He also said that, if grants and government help surface in the future that would reduce the cost to the water customers and some adjustment could be made.
Considering everything, I don’t think I will be holding my breath in anticipation of state or federal help.
Double The Rate For Non-Decatur Residents
While Decatur water users are going to be hit with a doubling of their water rates over the next three years, non-Decatur residents and businesses, such as Mount Zion water customers, will be hit even harder.
They are already paying double the rate that Decatur residents pay and the double rate should double again.
Some Final Thoughts...
As I mentioned in this column last week, the proposed water system enhancement plan seems pretty solid.
Considering it is more of a long-term “emergency plan” generated by a three-drought wake-up call, there’s a combination of viable options to deal with a nagging long-term problem.
Sometimes, a community has to be hit hard before it really gets serious on correcting a problem.
I think everyone got the message after the third drought.
As I mentioned in my “Viewpoint” column, the mayor, council, city manager and staff are to be commended for assembling a plan for the future regarding our water needs.
It’s too bad the big increase in water rates cannot be spread out over a longer period of time -- four or five years instead of three -- or there could be some relief offered to those who are already dealing with financial survival on a day-to-day basis.
I personally know of many people who are struggling to make ends meet now and the rate increase will make it even more of a burden for them.
McCrady indicated the three-year rate hike is essential and it would delay projects if spread out over five years and if adjustments were made on the rates for those less able to pay the increase, others would have to be charged more.
I’m sure there will be some expressions of concern from council members about the negative impact on those in the community, but the bottom line is they will vote for the plan and the money to pay for it through higher rates to water customers. I don’t see that they have much choice.
Dealing with our water needs is critical to our future -- but this project, while well thought out, comes with some real economic pain for those who are already hurting in our community.
No one can feel good about that aspect of the plan.
Listen to the “City Hall Insider” hour with Paul Osborne on Byers & Co. at 7:00 every Thursday morning over NEWS/TALK 1340 WSOY.
Posted 3/27/13